CMOs are entering 2027 planning with greater responsibility for growth but constrained budgets, fragmented data, and increasing pressure to prove financial impact. Recent CMO research reveals a strategic choice: lead the enterprise’s commercial intelligence system through Signal-Led GTM™, or risk seeing marketing reduced from an ELT growth function to an execution capability operating beneath someone else’s mandate.

CEOs have spent years investing in sales training, enablement technology, methodologies and now AI. Yet research shows 68% of B2B buyers already have a preferred vendor when their buying process begins—and that vendor wins 80% of the time. The 2027 question isn't whether sellers need more enablement. It's whether enablement begins early enough to materially change the probability of winning.

AI may make marketing faster, but speed alone won’t create a 2027 growth advantage. The AMA’s 2026 research points to a larger shift: execution is becoming abundant while strategy, judgment and orchestration move upstream. For CEOs and CMOs, the question is no longer how much AI you deploy. It’s whether your GTM system can see where demand may form before competitors do.

Your 2027 revenue plan is also a roster decision. As CEOs begin strategic planning, the question isn't simply what growth target to set—it’s whether the organization has the GTM system, capabilities and talent required to deliver it. See how CEOs, CROs and CHROs can rethink organizational design, measure future-ready capabilities and build a GTM roster designed for the market ahead.

Companies continue to invest heavily in sales training. Better discovery. Better prospecting. Better qualification. Better opportunity management. Better negotiation. Better account planning. Better coaching. The assumption underneath that investment is straightforward: If we improve seller capability, revenue performance should improve. That assumption deserves closer examination. Not because sales training does not matter. It does. But because buyer behavior, seller roles

B2B companies invest nearly $300,000 annually in each enterprise seller. Across 100 sellers, that’s $28.8M in commercial capital. But what if that investment reaches buyers after preferences are already forming? Before approving the 2027 growth plan, CEOs should ask a harder question: Is our commercial system designed to earn a place on the buyer’s Day 1 List—or are we investing millions to compete after the decision has already begun?

Six months ago, Lucrum Partners published five predictions about how commercial organizations would need to evolve to sustain predictable growth. Those predictions weren't based on emerging technology or industry hype. They were based on observable shifts in buyer behavior, executive priorities, and commercial operating models. Six months later, the verified first-half 2026 evidence from Gartner, McKinsey, SBI Growth, Polaris I/O, TSIA, 6sense, earnings calls, is difficult

Recent earnings reports from leading industrial and manufacturing companies reveal a pattern that should concern executive leadership teams and investors alike. The issue is not revenue growth. The issue is growth quality.

Every year, thousands of HR leaders gather at SHRM's annual conference with a common aspiration: Earn greater influence. Become more strategic. Get a seat at the executive table. But after reviewing this year's conference agenda, a key What if the reason HR isn't consistently invited into enterprise strategy conversations isn't because CEOs undervalue HR?

By Brian Shea, Lucrum Partners For years, Strategic Account Management (SAM) has centered on a familiar set of disciplines: Account plans Relationship maps Executive sponsorship programs Quarterly business reviews Growth plans Opportunity management These practices remain important. But after reviewing the themes, sessions, and practitioner discussions emerging from the 2026 Strategic Account Management Association (SAMA) Conference, one conclusion became clear: The future of

CFOs need earlier visibility. CMOs need greater predictability. Signal-Led GTM™ provides the missing link between executive strategy and commercial execution by helping organizations detect growth signals before pipeline exists. Learn how emerging CFO and CMO priorities align around signal governance and why the future of growth depends on managing signals—not just leads and opportunities.

From James Taylor to Phil Collins, from arena rock to film scores, Sklar became one of the most trusted session musicians in the world not because he was the loudest person in the room, but because he consistently made the entire performance better. For modern GTM leaders, especially those navigating AI disruption, buying-group complexity, and declining effectiveness of traditional pipeline systems, Sklar’s interview offers a surprisingly powerful blueprint for revenue lea

Most executive teams believe they have a sales execution problem. They don’t. They have a timing problem disguised as a sales problem. Why? Because most go-to-market systems are still architected around a buying motion that no longer exists. The modern B2B buyer does not wait for sellers to educate them. They research independently. They form buying groups early. They define requirements before engagement. They shortlist vendors before sellers even know an opportunit

Most commercial teams are optimized to respond to requirements instead of shaping decisions. Learn how Signal-Led GTM™ helps organizations engage buyers earlier and improve growth execution.

Why traditional sales qualification frameworks fall short in modern B2B buying, and how a Signal-Led GTM™ system helps leaders win before pipeline forms. For years, frameworks like MEDDPICC have been treated as the gold standard for sales execution. And to be clear, they’re not wrong. They’re just late. In a world where: Buyers define problems before engaging vendors Shortlists are formed before pipeline exists And decisions are shaped outside seller visibility The issue isn’

At the start of Q2, thousands of CRO, CMO, and growth roles are open; not from expansion, but replacement. With average tenure under two years, instability is the norm. Unlike finance, where systems are fixed, growth teams keep rotating leaders through outdated GTM models, ignoring warning signs while buyers move on without them.

Why custom software firms are still selling like it’s 2018, and paying for it in 2026 From 2015- 2018, the world changed for custom software development firms. “Digital transformation” wasn’t a buzzword, it was a budget unlock. Demand exploded. Buyers flooded the market. And for a moment, it didn’t matter how you went to market. If you had developers…If you could deliver…If you responded fast enough…You grew. Then something subtle, and dangerous, happened. You built your GTM

The headlines around the “One Big Beautiful Bill” have been loud. But for construction executives — especially MEP leaders and DPR-style commercial builders — the real question isn’t: “How much funding was approved?” The smarter question is: “Where are the demand signals actually forming?”

The competitive gap in B2B is no longer defined by who has the best relationships or the biggest balance sheet. It’s defined by who sees what’s coming—and organizes their business to act on it first. In capital-intensive industries like commercial construction and energy services (ESCO), that difference is becoming existential.

Missed bookings in Q1 don’t just delay revenue. They compound into a structural revenue gap that most firms never fully recover within the year. This blog explains why that happens—and how a Signal-Led GTM™ model prevents it.