Recent earnings reports from leading industrial and manufacturing companies reveal a pattern that should concern executive leadership teams and investors alike. The issue is not revenue growth. The issue is growth quality.

What does Phil Collins have to do with Signal-Led GTM™? According to legendary bassist Leland Sklar, Phil Collins believed the audience at the first show deserved the same experience as the audience at the hundredth. The result was relentless preparation before ever stepping on stage. The same principle applies to revenue growth. The best GTM teams don't learn during customer conversations. They prepare before them.

by Brian Shea, CEO Lucrum Partners Why May's 172,000 jobs report is a case study in Signal-Led GTM™ The headlines focused on the number. 172,000 jobs added in May. Predictably, the debate immediately became political. Was it proof that economic policies are working? Was it merely a continuation of existing trends? Which administration deserves credit? For business leaders, those questions miss the more important lesson. The May jobs report is not the story. It is the outcome

What caught my attention wasn't the technology. It was what one executive said about salespeople. "I'd rather work directly with the executive team than involve salespeople. Most salespeople only care about getting meetings, not getting outcomes for the customer." The room went silent. Not because the statement was controversial. Because everyone in the room knew exactly what he meant.

From James Taylor to Phil Collins, from arena rock to film scores, Sklar became one of the most trusted session musicians in the world not because he was the loudest person in the room, but because he consistently made the entire performance better. For modern GTM leaders, especially those navigating AI disruption, buying-group complexity, and declining effectiveness of traditional pipeline systems, Sklar’s interview offers a surprisingly powerful blueprint for revenue lea

Most executive teams believe they have a sales execution problem. They don’t. They have a timing problem disguised as a sales problem. Why? Because most go-to-market systems are still architected around a buying motion that no longer exists. The modern B2B buyer does not wait for sellers to educate them. They research independently. They form buying groups early. They define requirements before engagement. They shortlist vendors before sellers even know an opportunit

Most executives were introduced to root cause analysis long before they ever entered a boardroom. For many, it started in elementary school science classes. A plant died. Why? Not enough water. Why? The soil drained too quickly. Why? The wrong soil composition was used. Why? The environment wasn’t evaluated before planting. Even as children, we were taught a foundational principle: the visible problem is rarely the actual problem.

New research from SBI Growth Advisory and Polaris I/O found that signal-driven account teams: → Generated 4x more qualified opportunities→ Converted at 71% versus 20% for traditional approaches→ Closed deals 7.4x larger→ Closed deals 128 days faster Those are not marginal improvements. Those are operating model differences.

Most commercial teams are optimized to respond to requirements instead of shaping decisions. Learn how Signal-Led GTM™ helps organizations engage buyers earlier and improve growth execution.

There’s a pattern in history most leaders miss: Progress doesn’t come from better people. It comes from a better operating system.

Why traditional sales qualification frameworks fall short in modern B2B buying, and how a Signal-Led GTM™ system helps leaders win before pipeline forms. For years, frameworks like MEDDPICC have been treated as the gold standard for sales execution. And to be clear, they’re not wrong. They’re just late. In a world where: Buyers define problems before engaging vendors Shortlists are formed before pipeline exists And decisions are shaped outside seller visibility The issue isn’

At the start of Q2, thousands of CRO, CMO, and growth roles are open; not from expansion, but replacement. With average tenure under two years, instability is the norm. Unlike finance, where systems are fixed, growth teams keep rotating leaders through outdated GTM models, ignoring warning signs while buyers move on without them.

Why custom software firms are still selling like it’s 2018, and paying for it in 2026 From 2015- 2018, the world changed for custom software development firms. “Digital transformation” wasn’t a buzzword, it was a budget unlock. Demand exploded. Buyers flooded the market. And for a moment, it didn’t matter how you went to market. If you had developers…If you could deliver…If you responded fast enough…You grew. Then something subtle, and dangerous, happened. You built your GTM

Every year, leadership teams tell themselves the same story: “Q1 is where we test. We’ll adjust as we go.” That story is now dangerous. IDC makes it clear: Q1 is not a learning quarter; it’s where commitments are made, direction is set, and momentum is locked. Which means: If your GTM motion is misaligned in Q1…You don’t adjust in Q2. You absorb the consequences.

Why the companies winning today aren’t improving the system—they’re replacing it Winners aren’t building a faster horse. They’re building a rocket ship. The next generation of market leaders isn’t optimizing pipeline—they’re redesigning how revenue is created, starting with signals, not leads. The Mistake Most CEOs Are Still Making Most executive teams believe they’re evolving their go-to-market. They’re investing in: better tools better process better training But let’s be d

"Drive to Survive" didn’t make cars faster. It made the signals visible. For the first time, audiences could see: The strategy behind pit stops The tension in split-second decisions The data informing every move The personalities interpreting the signals The show transformed F1 from “cars going in circles” into “a high-stakes, real-time decision system powered by data.” That’s the exact transformation happening in B2B growth right now. The Parallel: Netflix Did for F1 What Si

40–60% of deals end in no decision, 61% are lost to buyer indecision, and 70% of churn signals appear months before renewal—yet most revenue teams still detect problems only after pipeline breaks. For decades, revenue leaders have tried to fix growth problems by focusing on pipeline performance. They analyze conversion rates. They coach sellers on closing skills. They push for more activity. Most pipeline problems don’t actually start in pipeline. They start months earl

M&A models assume value is created at signing. Experienced operators know the truth: Value is either captured—or quietly lost—during commercial integration. While most integration playbooks emphasize finance, HR, and IT, the real erosion often begins inside the revenue engine—specifically across pipeline, backlog, and client health.

The headlines around the “One Big Beautiful Bill” have been loud. But for construction executives — especially MEP leaders and DPR-style commercial builders — the real question isn’t: “How much funding was approved?” The smarter question is: “Where are the demand signals actually forming?”

Most revenue risk doesn’t come from losing customers. It comes from misclassifying where growth is actually possible.